Intro¶
The benchmarks were done using two test files (for mdf version 3 and 4) of around 170MB. The files contain 183 data groups and a total of 36424 channels.
asamdf 2.1.0 was compared against mdfreader 0.2.5. mdfreader seems to be the most used Python package to handle MDF files, and it also supports both version 3 and 4 of the standard.
The three benchmark cathegories are file open, file save and extracting the data for all channels inside the file(36424 calls). For each cathegory two aspect were noted: elapsed time and peak RAM usage.
Dependencies¶
You will need the following packages to be able to run the benchmark script
- psutil
- mdfreader
x64 Python results¶
The test environment used for 64 bit tests had:
- 3.6.2 (v3.6.2:5fd33b5, Jul 8 2017, 04:57:36) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
- Windows-10-10.0.14393-SP0
- Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3, GenuineIntel
- 16GB installed RAM
Notations used in the results
- nodata = MDF object created with load_measured_data=False (raw channel data not loaded into RAM)
- compression = MDF object created with compression=True/blosc
- compression bcolz 6 = MDF object created with compression=6
- noDataLoading = MDF object read with noDataLoading=True
Files used for benchmark: * 183 groups * 36424 channels
Open file | Time [ms] | RAM [MB] |
---|---|---|
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv3 | 1088 | 379 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv3 | 1287 | 298 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv3 | 896 | 198 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv3 | 3533 | 537 |
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv4 | 2027 | 464 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv4 | 2504 | 367 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv4 | 1668 | 268 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv4 | 34908 | 748 |
Save file | Time [ms] | RAM [MB] |
---|---|---|
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv3 | 398 | 379 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv3 | 523 | 302 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv3 | 23881 | 1997 |
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv4 | 554 | 471 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv4 | 615 | 373 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv4 | 21288 | 2795 |
Get all channels (36424 calls) | Time [ms] | RAM [MB] |
---|---|---|
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv3 | 577 | 383 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv3 | 13504 | 306 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv3 | 9506 | 210 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv3 | 30 | 536 |
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv4 | 498 | 469 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv4 | 15310 | 377 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv4 | 12565 | 280 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv4 | 40 | 748 |
Graphical results¶
(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

x86 Python results¶
The test environment used for 32 bit tests had:
- Python 3.6.1 (v3.6.1:69c0db5, Mar 21 2017, 17:54:52) [MSC v.1900 32 bit (Intel)]
- Windows-7-6.1.7601-SP1
- Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3, GenuineIntel (i7-6820Q)
- 16GB installed RAM
The notations used in the results have the following meaning:
- nodata = MDF object created with load_measured_data=False (raw channel data no loaded into RAM)
- compression = MDF object created with compression=True (raw channel data loaded into RAM and compressed)
- noconvert = MDF object created with convertAfterRead=False
Raw data¶
- 3.6.1 (v3.6.1:69c0db5, Mar 21 2017, 17:54:52) [MSC v.1900 32 bit (Intel)]
- Windows-10-10.0.14393-SP0
- Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3, GenuineIntel
- 16GB installed RAM
Notations used in the results
- nodata = MDF object created with load_measured_data=False (raw channel data not loaded into RAM)
- compression = MDF object created with compression=True/blosc
- compression bcolz 6 = MDF object created with compression=6
- noDataLoading = MDF object read with noDataLoading=True
Files used for benchmark: * 183 groups * 36424 channels
Open file | Time [ms] | RAM [MB] |
---|---|---|
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv3 | 1149 | 294 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv3 | 1368 | 202 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv3 | 861 | 123 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv3 | 3755 | 455 |
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv4 | 2316 | 348 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv4 | 2694 | 247 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv4 | 1886 | 166 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv4 | 43210 | 578 |
Save file | Time [ms] | RAM [MB] |
---|---|---|
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv3 | 413 | 297 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv3 | 592 | 204 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv3 | 20038 | 1224 |
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv4 | 720 | 357 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv4 | 674 | 253 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv4 | 17553 | 1687 |
Get all channels (36424 calls) | Time [ms] | RAM [MB] |
---|---|---|
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv3 | 784 | 299 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv3 | 25345 | 207 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv3 | 18657 | 133 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv3 | 35 | 455 |
asammdf 2.2.0 mdfv4 | 695 | 354 |
asammdf 2.2.0 compression mdfv4 | 24325 | 255 |
asammdf 2.2.0 nodata mdfv4 | 20745 | 176 |
mdfreader 0.2.5 mdfv4 | 50 | 578 |
Graphical results¶
(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)

(Source code, png, hires.png, pdf)
